250 interchange stalls in city council

Engineers who may have left July 27’s 250 Bypass Interchange Steering Committee meeting feeling optimistic were in for a brutal dose of reality on August 7, when City Council got a look-see at the intersection’s five potential design alternatives.
    “It’s an awful lot coming awful fast,” Council member Kevin Lynch said. “Maybe we are pushing you faster than we need to.”
    After a detailed presentation by RK&K’s Owen Peery, Lynch commended the group. “You’ve generated a tremendous amount of product,” he said. The Baltimore-based engineers started working on the beleaguered project in January of this year.
    The slide show stressed the size of the designs for the McIntire-250 intersection that could be crucial to the controversial Meadowcreek Parkway project, contrasting them with larger traffic patterns in areas like Barracks Road.
    But it was not enough to mollify City Council. “All of these interchange options are larger than they need to be,” said Lynch. RK&K’s Bill Hellman said the size of the geometric design is necessary to meet federal funding requirements.
    Lynch suggested that one of the connectors be modified to handle more traffic. “You have to change the size of your pipes, because it’s just like water,” Lynch said. “It’s going to follow the path of least resistance. If you put a big fat pipe through the city, and a little thin pipe going around it, then any model’s going to go through the city.”
    As Lynch doggedly continued to press various concerns, and the clock struck 11pm, Peery and his RK&K mates struggled to muster adequate responses. Even Mayor David Brown seemed worn down. “All right, I don’t know if we’re going to resolve this at the moment,” Brown said wearily, seeking an end to the discussion. “I don’t know if there’s an answer here.” Many Parkway opponents would undoubtably agree.